The graph shows data about the annual earnings of three bakeries in Calgary 2000 2010

Essay topics:

"The graph shows data about the annual earnings of three bakeries in Calgary, 2000-2010."

The line graph gives information about the yearly income of three different bakeries from 2000 to 2010.
It’s clear that there were significant changes in the annual earnings of the three bakeries shown on the graph. While both Amadine bakery and Bolo Cakery experienced a considerable increase in yearly incomes, it can be seen that the annual earnings of Mari Bakery fell down dramatically during a period of 10 years.
In 2000, Bolo Cakery earned $20000, meanwhile, this figure of Amadine bakery nearly tripled and Mari Bakery was four times at this time. Between the year 2000 and the year 2003, Bolo Cakery experienced an enormous growth at approximately $40000 in 2003, and this number stably remained over the following 3 years. By contrast, there was a fluctuation in the income level of Mari Bakery during the first 5 years, and this figure slumped just to nearly $60000 in 2005. Unlike the two above bakeries, the amount of money Amadine bakery got stayed stable during the same period at almost $60000.
From 2005 to 2010, an upward trend was seen similarly in the earnings of both Amadine bakery and Bolo Cakery. The amount of money Amadine bakery got in 2010 nearly doubled to approximately $120000 in comparison with the first year. Also, Bolo Cakery’s income was almost three times during the same period with above $60000. By contrast, the annual earnings of Mari Bakery saw a substantial reduction to just $40000 in the year 2010.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-02-26 Wardiati Yusuf 73 view
2022-10-12 Thy Lê 56 view
2022-08-31 mary.ssherr 78 view
2022-08-26 mary.ssherr 78 view
2022-08-22 mary.ssherr 90 view
Essays by user Huyen Đang :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 355, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...000. By contrast, the annual earnings of Mari Bakery saw a substantial reduction...
^^
Line 4, column 374, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he annual earnings of Mari Bakery saw a substantial reduction to just 0000 in th...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, similarly, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1198.0 965.302439024 124% => OK
No of words: 245.0 196.424390244 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88979591837 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39897937482 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.485714285714 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 365.4 283.868780488 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.0915529165 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.909090909 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2727272727 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.36363636364 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278710435636 0.215688989381 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137305338683 0.103423049105 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104514007371 0.0843802449381 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226833727339 0.15604864568 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0868583738435 0.0819641961636 106% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.43 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.