In many countries, traditional foods are being replaced by international fast food. Many people think that it’s good to eat traditional foods while others believe that fast food is a good choice. Discuss both views and give a good choice .
People have different views about choosing suitable foods for their diet. While some people are of the opinion that pre-made food is better than traditional food, I agree with those who believe that traditional food brings more benefits
On the one hand, it’s undeniable that pre-made food is extremely convenient. Instead of cooking and preparing for long hours at home, people just go to fast food restaurants and enjoy their meals quickly. Therefore, they can save ample time to do other things. Furthermore, fast food provides a huge amount of energy, this is really necessary for those who have to work all day without having a rest. The high calories inside junk food play an important role in developing muscle systems as well as their power.
On the other hand, I would argue that home-made food should be used more than due to its remarkable benefits. Firstly, it’s clear that traditional food is healthy and salubrious. Unlike fast food, traditional food is made at home. Everyone has chances to choose clean ingredients, and prepare and cook by themselves. That’s the reason why homemade food always ensures safeness of quality. Moreover, consuming an excessive amount of cholesterol in fast food causes serious diseases. Although pre-made food is rich in energy, eating it frequently has negative influences on our health. According to some recent research, the more cholesterol people take in from fast food, the higher rate of diseases related to the blood they get. Last but not least, traditional food is one of the significant ways to reserve and reflect cultural beauty through cuisine. For example, when inviting a foreigner to come to your home, he will be attracted by some dishes which you prepared. These foods not only provide essential nutrition to your health but also are effective tools to pose your spiritual values about your country through flavor.
In conclusion, despite the fact that fast food gives several certain advantages, I believe that using traditional foods has more positive values that they shouldn’t be replaced.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-04-19 | Huyen Đang | 84 | view |
- the pie chart compares water usage in San Diego California and the rest of the world 78
- In many countries traditional foods are being replaced by international fast food Many people think that it s good to eat traditional foods while others believe that fast food is a good choice Discuss both views and give a good choice 84
- The table below gives information about the problems faced by children in two primary schools in 2005 and 2015 73
- The graph below shows the average number of UK commuters travelling each day by car bus or train between 1970 and 2030 73
- More and more people are migrating to cities in search of a better life but city life can be extremely difficult Explain some of the difficulties of living in a city How can governments make urban life better for everyone 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 237, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...at traditional food brings more benefits On the one hand, it’s undeniable that pr...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 264, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to clean'
Suggestion: to clean
...at home. Everyone has chances to choose clean ingredients, and prepare and cook by th...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 180, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...values that they shouldn’t be replaced.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, really, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in conclusion, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1739.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 336.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1755952381 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60216419609 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619047619048 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 531.0 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.7604876993 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.6111111111 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.16666666667 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.396924408148 0.244688304435 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135187283822 0.084324248473 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0918306379835 0.0667982634062 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.278003303782 0.151304729494 184% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0544586382255 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.