The graph shows data about the annual earnings of three bakeries in London 2000 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The given graph describes information about the yearly incomes of three bakeries from Longdon between 2000 and 2010. Overall, each bakery followed a different trend from the others, while the earnings of Amandine Bakery and The Bolo Cakery increased dramatically, the figure for Mari Bakeshop saw a considerable fall over the period. Another interesting point is that Mari Bakeshop was the most popular in 2000 but in 2010, Amandine bakery earned the most.
Both Amandine Bakery and Bolo cakery followed an upward trend. It is clear that the income of amandine cakery was stable during the first 5 years at approximately over 50000 dollars before reaching a peak at more than 100000 dollars in 2010. Looking at the details of Bolo Cakery, the earning started at 20000 dollars in 2000, rose slightly each year to 40000 dollars in 2003, then followed a stable trend until 2006. The figure went up significantly, finishing at around 65000 dollars in 2010.
By contrast, the income ò Mari Bakeshop went in the opposite direction. Started at around 80000 dollars in 2000 and rose slightly in the next four years, after decreasing sharply to 40000 in 2010

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, look, then, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 963.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.015625 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49264869688 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578125 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 283.5 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.3741556312 43.030603864 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.0 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 5.23603664747 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146944437509 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0723701219715 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0740738632571 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104703488952 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0763015279144 0.0819641961636 93% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.