The graph shows data about the annual earnings of three bakeries in London, 2000-2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The chart shows information relative to the annual revenue of three London bakeries (Bernie’s Buns, Lovely Loaves, and Robbie’s Bakery) between the years 2000 and 2010 whose income unit was presented in pounds.

Overall, the line graph reveals some similarities between Bernie’s Buns and Robbie’s Bakery due to both had an ascending line in the analysed period while Lovely Loaves had a descending curve. Additionally, there was a significant change in bakery positions comparing the beginning and end of the period owing to Robbie’s Bakery had the second largest earning in 2000 and the largest in 2010 while Lovely Loaves had the biggest gain in 2000 and the smallest in 2010.

Figure details display relevant features in each bakery evaluated. Specifically, about Robbie’s Bakery, the annual revenue was stable until 2005; after that, there was a considerable increase. Almost the same performance happened with Bernie’s Buns, although his stability period was between 2003 and 2007. On the other hand, Lovely Loaves had only two modest rise periods (2000-201 and 2003-2004) and one stable period (2008-2010); however, there was a dramatic decrease comparing the earnings in 2000 ( £80.000 ) and 2010 ( £40.000 ).

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 504, Rule ID: CURRENCY[2]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '£2000'.
Suggestion: £2000
...atic decrease comparing the earnings in 2000 £ 80.000 and 2010 £ 40.000.
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 509, Rule ID: CURRENCY_SPACE[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually written without any whitespace: '£80'.
Suggestion: £80
...decrease comparing the earnings in 2000 £ 80.000 and 2010 £ 40.000.
^^^^
Line 3, column 522, Rule ID: CURRENCY[2]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '£2010'.
Suggestion: £2010
...aring the earnings in 2000 £ 80.000 and 2010 £ 40.000.
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 527, Rule ID: CURRENCY_SPACE[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually written without any whitespace: '£40'.
Suggestion: £40
... the earnings in 2000 £ 80.000 and 2010 £ 40.000.
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, second, so, while, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1054.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46113989637 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87707101963 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580310880829 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 302.4 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.355911319 43.030603864 159% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.571428571 112.824112599 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5714285714 22.9334400587 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177896647498 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0845082749637 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0687209115775 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142605412055 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0537695960116 0.0819641961636 66% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.2329268293 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 61.2550243902 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 11.4140731707 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.4329268293 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.0658536585 172% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.