The graph shows estimated oil production capacity for several Gulf countries between 1990 and 2010.
The bar chart illustrates the amount of oil produced by different seven countries over a two decade period.
Overall, there were upward trends for all six countries except for Qatar whose this figure experienced slight fluctuation over the period. Another interesting point is that Saudi Arabia made up the largest proportion compared to the others.
Looking at details, in 1990, Saudi Arabia ranked the first place with over 8 million of oil barrels per day which was nearly tripled the amount of oil produced by Iran at that time, at 3 millions of barrels. This figures for Iraq, Kuwait and UAE were similarly at around 2 million of oil barrels a day. Meanwhile the amount of oil manufactured in Qatar just contributed a negligible part, at nearly 1 million of barrel a day. In 2000, the quantity of oil produced in UAE stayed unchanged while other countries witnessed a gentle improvement in their oil productions.
In 2005, there were marginal more oil manufactured in Iraq, Kuwait and UAE at similarly 3 million of oil barrels each compared to 4 million of oil barrels in Iran which has been remained unchanged since 2000. However, all four countries reached the finishing point at 4 million of oil barrels in 2010. Saudi Arabia saw a dramatic jump in 2005, which was 3 million of oil barrels higher as opposed to its figure in 2005 then reached the peak at over 14 million of oil barrels at the end of the period, remain the first place successfully. By contrast this figure for Qatar fall down slightly over the last decade, finally returned the initial point in 2010.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-05 | lehonganh | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-22 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-22 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-22 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 78 | view |
| 2019-05-31 | hin07 | 73 | view |
- The chart below shows the percentage of the population in the UK who consumed the recommended daily amount of fruit and vegetables in 2002 2006 and 2010 89
- : Research shows that business meetings, discussions and training are happening online nowadays. Do the advantage outweigh the disadvantage? 84
- People have little understanding of the importance of the natural world. What are the reasons and how can people learn more about natural world? 89
- when design a building, the most important factor is intend use of the building rather than its outward appearance. Do you agree or disagree? 56
- The charts below show the percentage of people aged 23-65 in different occupations in one UK town and the UK as a whole in 2008. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 74, Rule ID: WHOSE_DT[5]
Message: Did you mean 'who's'?
Suggestion: who's
... for all six countries except for Qatar whose this figure experienced slight fluctuat...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 186, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '3 million'.
Suggestion: 3 million
...f oil produced by Iran at that time, at 3 millions of barrels. This figures for Iraq, Kuwait ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 303, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Meanwhile,
... around 2 million of oil barrels a day. Meanwhile the amount of oil manufactured in Qatar...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 386, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...ich was 3 million of oil barrels higher as opposed to its figure in 2005 then reac...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, look, similarly, then, while, except for, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 33.7804878049 154% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1308.0 965.302439024 136% => OK
No of words: 273.0 196.424390244 139% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79120879121 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57881181255 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501831501832 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 393.3 283.868780488 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.5573700052 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.909090909 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8181818182 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.54545454545 5.23603664747 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149844179455 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0749795197276 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0355897858649 0.0843802449381 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100146315157 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0177327367857 0.0819641961636 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.