The graph shows the frequency of eating fast food at restaurant among people in the USA 2003 and 2013.
The assigned bar chart compares the percentage of Americans who consumed street food at cafes during distinct time of the days from 2003 to 2013.
Overall, it is lucid that the majority of people in the USA ate preserved food once a week and twice a month as opposed to a few times of a year and several times of a week that was the least over the period shown.
With regards to unhealthy food, it was eaten by Americans below 5% every day. However, 5% people in 2003 and around 4% in 2006 and 2013, who never ate such food. Before rising to a fifth in 2006, it dwindled about 17% in 2003, and again depleted to 16% in 2013, the proportion of packed food lovers several times a week.
In the case of eating fast food once a week, having rose to 35% in 2006 from 33% in 2003 before declining to 26% in 2013.
There was a yawning gap between 2003 and 2013, when the food was eaten by Americans twice a month at 30%, 25% and 34% respectively.
Lastly, although the portion stayed identical in 2003 and 2006, in 2003, the ratio declined by 3% to eat fast food.
- An increasing number of people change their career and place of residence several times during their lifetime Is this a positive or negative development 78
- The diagram below shows the changes made in an Australian park 75
- The maps below shows the changes made in an Australian park in 2015 and now 61
- Some business find that their new employees lack in basic interpersonal skills such as the lack of ability to work with colleagues as a team What are the causes and suggest possible solutions Aslo provide relevant examples from your experience 83
- Pressure on the school and university students is increasing and students are pushed to hard work when they are young Do you think it is a positive or a negative development 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Lastly
...onth at 30%, 25% and 34% respectively. lastly, although the portion stayed identical...
^^^^^^
Line 8, column 21, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... 34% respectively. lastly, although the portion stayed identical in 2003 and 200...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, lastly
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 878.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.22115384615 4.92477711251 86% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.15847716426 2.65546596893 81% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543269230769 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 252.9 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 29.7554659702 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.428571429 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.7142857143 22.9334400587 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.42857142857 5.23603664747 27% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 7.0 3.83414634146 183% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.323206250791 0.215688989381 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.164038465451 0.103423049105 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0399120990691 0.0843802449381 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155132343995 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0565057308289 0.0819641961636 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 75.88 61.2550243902 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.79 11.4140731707 68% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.