The number of cars keeps increasing,so road system should be expanded.some people think the government should pay for it, while othets think the car owners should pay for it.Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Undoubtedly, in the fast paced competitive era, accelerating the population of cars gives an invitation to extend the road system. The authority is onus to do it as per the consideration of certain individuals as opposed to opponents who comtemplate that it is solely the liablity of the car owners. I, however, side with not only the latter but also the former view. Both perspectives will be examined in the upcoming paragraphs before reaching to a concrete conclusion.
Two glaring opinions that why minority of folks opine the government should pay for road systems are enumerated following. Since the regime have superior architects to expand road systems, the prime minister of the nation should pay for it on the priority. To elucidate it, ordinary people are not capable of doing such a big work on a national level lonely. To add to it, the level of road accidents can not be reduced unless the government wide up the size of the roads. Unquestionably, non wider roads lead to multiple deaths everyday. So, definitely, in this respect, the roads ought to be wided by the authority in the accordance of few people.
Despite the above mentioned striking view of some people, there are the rest society members who think the car owners are responsible for it. Firstly, if they pay some amount of money on it, there would be limited numbers of cars on the roads. When the cars counting decrese, the traffic congestion may automatically less because perhaps aware about the spending of their pocket money. What is more, people likely to maintain the roads neat and clean they would never throw landfills on the road after getting the singnificance of road system. Hence, few think car owner need to improve it.
To compendium and reiterate my opinion, although it is the fundamental responsibility of the government, by working shoulder to shoulder denizens are able to develop the road conditions.
- The maps below shows the changes made in an Australian park in 2015 and now 61
- The maps below shows the changes made in an Australian park in 2015 and now 74
- The diagram below shows the changes made in an Australian park 75
- An increasing number of people change their career and place of residence several times during their lifetime Is this a positive or negative development 78
- Many people think that some people are naturally good leader others think that people can learn leadership skills Discussing both views and give your opinion 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 331, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r owners. I, however, side with not only the latter but also the former view. Bot...
^^
Line 1, column 387, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... also the former view. Both perspectives will be examined in the upcoming paragra...
^^
Line 3, column 240, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...minister of the nation should pay for it on the priority. To elucidate it, ordina...
^^
Line 3, column 531, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...non wider roads lead to multiple deaths everyday. So, definitely, in this respect, the r...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 85, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... some people, there are the rest society members who think the car owners are res...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, may, so, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1588.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9625 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82773650647 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6125 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.6759457956 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.25 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 7.06120827912 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.377310852639 0.244688304435 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0999586787283 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0776032033484 0.0667982634062 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170163431271 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0965604759477 0.056905535591 170% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.