The graph shows how elderly people in the United States spent their free time between 1980 and 2010.
The provided graph gives information about the number of American aged people who spent their free hours in some entertainment from 1980 to 2010. Overall, most of the amount of the activities went up along the period, omitting watching television which steadily increased for 20 years subsequently decreased to the end.
In the 1980s, almost all of the activities were climbing in popularity. In contrast, only the percentage of going to the theatre experienced a downward slightly from 50 to 30. There were alterations in the 1990s, specifically on the reading hobby which encountered the opposite from the previous year where the percentage fell off from 40 to half of it. Not only reading but also for going to the theatre where it suddenly gained popularity from the number of 30% to 40%. Furthermore, in the 2000s, most of the entertainments gained attractions excluding for watching television where slowly had alighting from 70% to downwards.
In conclusion, hiking was steadily growing up over the years as well as surfing the internet where it then got rocketed from the 2000s to 2010s. Hence, visiting theatre and reading had fluctuation during the time.
- The chart below shows the number of users of popular social media sites over time 56
- The graph shows how elderly people in the United States spent their free time between 1980 and 2010 84
- A person s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions Old fashioned values such as honor kindness and trust no longer seem important To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion Give reasons for your 77
- The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 78
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 22, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ed to the end. In the 1980s, almost all of the activities were climbing in popularity....
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, if, so, then, well, in conclusion, in contrast, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 982.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14136125654 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86839330676 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607329842932 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 283.5 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.5134255892 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.111111111 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2222222222 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.88888888889 5.23603664747 189% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0817764961707 0.215688989381 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0363433039949 0.103423049105 35% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0864516068706 0.0843802449381 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0701098511449 0.15604864568 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0806362870434 0.0819641961636 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.