A person’s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions. Old-fashioned values, such as honor, kindness, and trust, no longer seem important.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Write at least 250 words.
Nowadays, people tend to repute others based on their social rank and owning in preference to primitive morals such as loyalty and tenderness. I completely agree with this statement, although I believe that traditional values still play an important part in our culture.
As we all know, some people these days are easily judging over anything, which made the reputations of the netizens become bad. It is familiar that physical condition sets off the criteria to evaluate dignities. For example, in some countries, those who are good-looking gained more attention and compliment from people, especially on social media. Hence, those who are considered below the standards of beauty are more often to gain waggery. This can be concluded that the attractive ones will be praised more rather than the individuals who actually play an important and good role in society.
On the other hand, old-fashioned morals such as honesty, kindness, and respect are less recognized at present in many societies. Many youngsters have more knowledge of famous ones such as YouTubers compared to those who fight for civilization. To illustrate, there is a trend where children and teenagers are asked to state the name of random categories functioning as warriors, public figures, and artists. As a result, the children apprised more with the artists compared to the rest. Consequently, this stated that social status and wealth are considered more enticing for youngsters.
Although the traditional values are now getting forgotten, they still play an important role in communities. In working at the office or group, we need those morals to get respected by others. Great teamwork accommodates partners who are reliable, dependable, and can be trusted. Consequently, these positive morals are noteworthy for children in living their future life.
In conclusion, considering that social status and wealth are more seen in public, I believe that old-fashioned values must not be eliminated from our daily lives. Therefore, we must teach the young generation about this culture, in order to survive and succeed in the future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-03 | The Lazy Tiger | 84 | view |
| 2023-05-03 | The Lazy Tiger | 78 | view |
| 2022-03-26 | Nyahmeo | 56 | view |
| 2021-12-30 | vuhieuquy | 67 | view |
| 2021-01-12 | Enkh_bold | 67 | view |
- The chart below shows the number of users of popular social media sites over time 56
- The chart below shows the number of users of popular social media sites over time 78
- The graph shows how elderly people in the United States spent their free time between 1980 and 2010 84
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 84
- The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, consequently, hence, if, look, so, still, therefore, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1788.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35329341317 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86944458324 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586826347305 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 560.7 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.9255947812 49.4020404114 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 99.3333333333 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5555555556 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.22222222222 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152890069288 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0451998151726 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0399865641016 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.088046796116 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0262984620481 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.