The graph shows how elderly people in the United States spent their free time between 1980 and 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Information about the proportion of the old age population who were engaged in different kinds of free-time activities from the 1980s until 2010 is illustrated in the given line graph.
Overall, it is evident that except in the case of theatre, there was an increase in the participation of the elderly population in these activities.
The most notable increase in involvement is seen in hiking, and this was from around 20% to a peak of 80% by 2010. In the case of surfing, this was just 5% in 1980, whereas it exhibited a uniform incline to 15% by 2000. However, it showed more than a three-fold increase in the next decade, to hit 50% in 2010.
Though there were some serious fluctuations in between, the rate of those who read over this period doubled from just 30 in 1980. Despite an arrest in the growth rate of those who were involved in watching TV after 2000, it remained the most popular free-time activity among this group almost till the end of the period, and this did not fall below 60.
The only exception is seen in the theatre when a decline in the share is noted, and this was by 5% between the years (50%-45%).
- The graph shows how elderly people in the United States spent their free time between 1980 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The graph shows how elderly people in the United States spent their free time between 1980 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The graph gives information about changes in the birth and death rates in New Zealand between 1901 and 2101 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph shows how elderly people in the United States spent their free time between 1980 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Water consumption The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 5.60731707317 250% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 933.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.5512195122 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50384118945 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580487804878 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.1400048614 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.625 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.625 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113304283427 0.215688989381 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0490800923672 0.103423049105 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0305241246724 0.0843802449381 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0601536422323 0.15604864568 39% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0346625542886 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.41 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.