The graph shows the impact of vaccination on the incidence of whooping cough, a childhood illness, between 1940 and 1990 in Britain.
Summarise the information ny selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant.
The line graph illustrates the rate of children were vaccinated in the UK and the effect of inoculations on the occurrences of whooping cough, a childhood illness over the period from 1940 to 1990. The general overview is that there was a correlation between the administration of vaccinations and the number of reported cases of whooping cough.
To specify, the number of incidences surged from 50000 in 1940 to 170000 in 1942, before a considerable drop to 60000 in the mid 1940s. After a sharp increase to the peak of 170000 again in 1950, the figure fluctuated to 90000 until the introduction ...
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2015-01-17 | saraswathi4567 | 79 | view |
| 2014-11-27 | thanhdoan6992 | 90 | view |
- The graph below shows the percentage of urban suburban and rural households in a European country that had Internet access between 1999 and 2004 76
- In some countries it is thought advisable that children begin formal education at four years old while in others they do not have to start school until they are seven or eight How far do you agree with either of these view 66
- In some countries young people have little leisure time and are under a lot of pressure to work hard on their studies What do you think are the causes of this What solutions can you suggest 75
- The graph shows the impact of vaccination on the incidence of whooping cough a childhood illness between 1940 and 1990 in Britain Summarise the information ny selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 90
- Creative artists should be given the freedom to express their own ideas in whichever way they wish. There should be no government restrictions on what they do.To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give your own opinion. 70
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.5 out of 9
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 8 10
No. of Words: 223 200
No. of Characters: 1055 1000
No. of Different Words: 119 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.864 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.731 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.877 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 66 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 49 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 39 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 26 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 27.875 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.547 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.375 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.437 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.725 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.087 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4