The graph shows the information about the international conferences in three capital cities in 1980 – 2010.
The line graph illustrates, the comparison of international conference held in three major capital cities between 1980 to 2010.
Overall, it is clear from the graph that, city C was the most significant place for international summits over the period given. In contrast, the other two cities has moderate decline in number of hosting such conferences.
In 1980, there were no more obligation hosted in city C, while city A and city B was the major cities for international conference during this period. However, as is observed, the total number of global meetings held in city C was dramatically increased to 20 by the year of 1990. Then, the trend was exceeded city A and city B and surged to 35 in 2000. After that there was a slight decrease in number of conference and finished approximately 30 at the end of the period.
At once, the average count of obligation in city A and city B in 1980 was 35 and 30 which is dipped relatively similar after five years about 30 and 20 respectively. Later, both cities shows some fluctuation in number of worldwide conference and joined with same account in 2005 around 27 each. While, city B hosted about 26 conference and city A dropped about 2 meetings and finished nearly 24 in 2010.
- Big salary is much more important than job satisfaction do you agree or disagree 91
- Some people believe bicycle have a lot of advantages while others believe bicycle have more disadvantages Discuss both views and give your opinion 63
- Some believe that success in life comes from hard work and determination Others think that it depends on factors such as money or personal appearance Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- The diagrams below show the design for a wave energy machine and its location 72
- The graph shows average annual expenditures on cell phone and residential phone services between 2001 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 328, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the trend was exceeded city A and city B and surged to 35 in 2000. After that the...
^^
Line 7, column 125, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...which is dipped relatively similar after five years about 30 and 20 respectively...
^^
Line 7, column 137, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ped relatively similar after five years about 30 and 20 respectively. Later, bot...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, then, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1023.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 217.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71428571429 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80286635458 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543778801843 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 313.2 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.3158053397 43.030603864 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 102.3 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.1 5.23603664747 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.400949763438 0.215688989381 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.164866653095 0.103423049105 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.130622511023 0.0843802449381 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.276064648603 0.15604864568 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.131617110403 0.0819641961636 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.