The graph reveals the information about international conferences in the three capital cities in the period from 1980 to 2010. The number of international conferences increased considerably in city C while the ones in both city A and city B decreased gradually.
Namely, city C started from a low base of 0 conference in 1980 then they rose more rapidly for the first 20 years of the reported period and reached to the highest peak at 35 conferences in 2000. However, city C slightly declined in number to 30 conferences in 2010.
On the contrary, both City A and City B had been 35 and 30 conferens at the first time. However, they fell to the lowest point at 29 and 20 conferences in 1985. They slightly declined from 1990 to 2000 and remained throughout the period from 2000 to 2010 at around 25 conferences
- The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000 78
- The graph shows the information about international conferences in three capital cities in 1980- 2010 56
- The charts below compare the age structure of the populations of France and India in 1984. 67
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The two graphs show the main sources of energy in the USA in 1980 and 1990. Write a report for a university lecturer describing the changes which occurred. Write at least 150 words 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 215, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed considerably in city C while the ones in both city A and city B decreased grad...
^^
Line 3, column 55, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... started from a low base of 0 conference in 1980 then they rose more rapidly for ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, then, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 674.0 965.302439024 70% => OK
No of words: 145.0 196.424390244 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.64827586207 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.47010008196 3.73543355544 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86637814363 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 74.0 106.607317073 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.510344827586 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 192.6 283.868780488 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.968380042 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.2857142857 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7142857143 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.28571428571 5.23603664747 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.393187304258 0.215688989381 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.212131986164 0.103423049105 205% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.216920620407 0.0843802449381 257% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.304677275348 0.15604864568 195% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.209481400883 0.0819641961636 256% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.69 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.