The graph shows information about the number of people in Australia who use Chinese, Arabic, Italian and Greek as their first language
The chart illustrates how many people in Australia used Italian, Greek, Chinese, and Arabic as their first language.
Overall, the number of people whose native speech is Chinese and Arabic saw an increase, while the figures for Greek and Italian declined. In addition, Chinese was the most popular language after 25 years.
In 1986, Greek was most commonly used by about 230,000 Australians as their first language, followed by a slight decrease and a final drop to just under 200,000 people in 2011. Similar change, but to a lesser extent, can be seen in the figure for Italian, which was the second most popular in 1989 with 150,000 speakers. This figure continued to fall slightly to just over 100,000 people in 2006 and stayed unchanged until 2011.
Conversely, about more than 100,000 Australians used Chinese as their first language, after which it witnessed a significant rise to reach a peak at exactly 350000 people in 2011, compared to the rest with just hovering around 150000. Meanwhile, the figure for Arabic saw a similar change, which slightly rose from just 50,000 in 1986 to 100,000 people at the end of the period.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 431, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n 2006 and stayed unchanged until 2011. Conversely, about more than 100,000 Aust...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, first, if, second, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 950.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97382198953 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39744845773 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581151832461 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 267.3 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.4944553146 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.75 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.875 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 5.23603664747 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29240165649 0.215688989381 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142195515055 0.103423049105 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108205024883 0.0843802449381 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21948268323 0.15604864568 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0955454761953 0.0819641961636 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.