The given line graph compares the ubiquity of four languages used as mother tongues in Australia from 1986 to 2011. From an overall perspective, it is clear that the number of Australian citizens who take Greek and Italian as their first language showed a downward trend, while a reserved pattern could be observed in the figures for Chinese and Arabic. In addition, Greek was the prevalent language in 1986, but Chinese held the leading position at the end of the period shown.
Looking first at the downward trend, the quantity of inhabitants in Australia who use Greek as a mother language was highest, at nearly 225000, followed by the data on Italian, at 150000. The period between 1986 and 2011 witnessed a dramatic decrease in Greece's figures to 150000 in 2011. Similarly, the number of people in Australia who use Italian as their first language flattened out at 100000 in 2006 and remained unaltered in the following five years.
Regarding the upward trend, 100000 Australians used Chinese as their mother tongue, which was twice as much as Arabic in 1986. There was a rocket in the data on the Chinese language, leading it to rank first in 2011, at 350000 people in Australia. In the same pattern, the Arabic language experienced a significant increase from 5000 in 1986 to 15000 in 2011, equal to the Greek language.
- Some people believe that everyone has a right to have access to university education and that governments should make it free for all students no matter what financial background they have To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- The diagram below shows the process of generating electricity from coal Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and makes comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 78
- Experts say older people were happier and healthier in the past because they did more exercise and spent more time with family and friends whereas many now suffer from loneliness and health problems What are the causes of this and what are some solutions 89
- The graph shows information about the number of people in Australia who use Chinese Arabic Italian and Greek as their first language 73
- Nowadays people have little awareness of the importance of the natural world What are the reasons and how can people learn more about natural world 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 272, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... first language showed a downward trend, while a reserved pattern could be observ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, look, regarding, similarly, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1105.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 227.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86784140969 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54500525682 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52422907489 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 321.3 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.2313556818 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.777777778 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2222222222 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.88888888889 5.23603664747 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.408504458096 0.215688989381 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.166461254216 0.103423049105 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0928934068757 0.0843802449381 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.287743027525 0.15604864568 184% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0419104029304 0.0819641961636 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.