The graph shows information about the percentage of people in full-time employment in Germany, Italy, Spain and the G7 average.
The bar chart illustrates the percentage of people worked on a full-time basis in Germany, Italy, Spain and the Average of the G7 countries, with dividing workers by three different age groups. Overall, the largest share of people who worked full-time belongs to workers in the 25-54 age bracket, while the percentage of people were in full-time employment of the youngest group is the smallest.
In regard to the 18-24 age group, the percentage of Italian workers did full-time is slight above 20%, following by just under 20% of workers from Spain. Even though the vast majority of people employed full-time is from Germany (just above 30%), it is still significant less than the share of workers contributed by the Average of the G7.
In terms of the 25-54 age bracket, the most considerable part of workers in full-time employment is contributed by Germany (just above 80%), following by Italy (under 70%) and Spain (just above 60%). In this age group Germany outraces the G7 Average (well above 70%), while the contribution of the remaining countries is still under.
According to the oldest group, Germany accounts for approximately 60% of people (fairly equal contribution of the Average of the G7 countries), while the percentage of workers from both Italy and Spain constitutes around 50%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-16 | katenokk84 | 67 | view |
- An increasing number of people are now using dating sites to meet their second halves Do you think that this tendency helps people to socialize or does more harm than good Give your opinion Provide relevant examples if necessary 78
- The use of social media is replacing face to face interaction among many people in society Do you think the advantages outweigh the advantages 84
- Many students around the world don t choose science subjects at university Give the reasons for this and describe the impact on the community 56
- Countries should spend moneyn on trains rather than new roads Do you agree or disagree 73
- Countries with long average working hours are economically more successful than those countries which do not work long hours To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, still, well, while, in regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1082.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 214.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05607476636 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70858793435 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.46261682243 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 324.9 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 28.5999857286 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.571428571 112.824112599 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.5714285714 22.9334400587 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85714285714 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284148468475 0.215688989381 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.15832585351 0.103423049105 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0832115854438 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191647215229 0.15604864568 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100509396974 0.0819641961636 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.2329268293 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 61.2550243902 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.66 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.