[In the name of God]
The bar graph illustrates the percentage of internet usage based on the age of the people during 1998 to 2000.
As can be clearly seen in the graph, 16 to 30-year-old people accounted for the highest percentage of internet users in comparison with other ages.
Evidently, the age with lowest percentage was less than 15, which represents 2% of internet users in 1998 to 9% in 2000. So the graph shows that there has been a slight rise in using internet by children and ironically, a fall in percentage of young and middle aged users with age of 16 to 50. What stands out in this chart is, the differences not only between children and youth, but also between 16 to 50-year-old people and people more than 50 in using internet as either their recreational domestic or must-have item at work.
As a result, having had high-speed, cost-efficient internet connection, it's no wonder people have been being led to becoming more and more internet users, despite their age as shown in the table.
- Some people think that technological progress has affected their lives To what extent do agree or disagree with the statement 56
- It is a natural process when animal species become extinct There is no reason why people should stop happening this Do you agree or disagree 78
- Due to effects of globalisation the cultures of some countries are influenced by others Some people think this is a natural process Others think this is a threat to cultural identity What is your opinion about this 84
- Some people argue that technological progress is always positive Others dispute this What is your view and why 80
- The graph shows Internet Usage in Taiwan by Age Group 1998 2000 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 21, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'with the lowest'.
Suggestion: with the lowest
...n with other ages. Evidently, the age with lowest percentage was less than 15, which repr...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 74, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...ed, cost-efficient internet connection, its no wonder people have been being led to...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 838.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.70786516854 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67363794409 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601123595506 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 248.4 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 39.0103262683 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.666666667 112.824112599 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.6666666667 22.9334400587 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290802262177 0.215688989381 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.168777434883 0.103423049105 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114364240717 0.0843802449381 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160765531811 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.142546846718 0.0819641961636 174% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.63 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.