The graph shows the number of marriages and divorces in the UK between 1975 and 2000
The line chart provides information about the proportion of marriages and divorces in the united kingdom during 1975 and 2000. The data is in the thousands per year.
Overall, it is seen clearly from the given line graph that the total number of overall marriages and first-time marriages had decreased over time. And the ratio for divorces and second-time weddings had experienced increments in the given time.
To comments with, there was nearly 490 thousand for total marriages accounted in 1975, which was 400,340, and 140 thousand more than the number of divorces, 2nd-time marriages and first-time marriage respectively.
In addition, the trend of the overall number of weddings and people who married the first time reached a peak of 650 and 400 thousand in 1985 respectively, whereas others showed increments in their ratios.
Moreover, the ratio of people who married two times and divorces had witnessed a positive trend from 1995 to 2000. Both relatively at around 250 thousand in the last year. Furthermore, the total marriage number started a downward trend in the following years, which was closely 590 thousand in 2000. And the proportion of first-time marriage had decreased to 300 thousand in 2000.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-14 | Zahid6400 | 67 | view |
| 2023-09-25 | kashyap sahil | view | |
| 2023-09-07 | abid1 | view | |
| 2023-09-07 | abid1 | view | |
| 2023-07-30 | Mike-Huang | 78 | view |
- The pie charts compare ways of accessing the news in Canada and Australia
- Most of the world s problems are caused by overpopulation Do you agree or disagree 67
- People can do nothing to improve the environment only governments and large companies can make a di erence To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The maps below show the changes that have taken place at Queen Mary Hospital since its construction in 1960 78
- The table below shows the percentage participation of women in senior management in three companies between 1975 and 2015 93
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 167, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... The data is in the thousands per year. Overall, it is seen clearly from the giv...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, moreover, second, whereas, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1031.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23350253807 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70872951664 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517766497462 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 288.9 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 54.4238918123 43.030603864 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.1 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 5.23603664747 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258071644744 0.215688989381 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105423576871 0.103423049105 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0714935151237 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149653239669 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0406785478552 0.0819641961636 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.