The graph shows the spending on research into renewable energy in four countries between 1975 and 2000. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
The line chart provides how the data about the amount of money that was spent to do research in the sector or energy which is renewable in Switzerland, Denmark, Spain, and UK is changed over 25 years, starting from 1975.
Overall, it can be seen that amount of money spending in renewable energy sector in Spain and Denmark is increased sharply whereas in Switzerland and UK, it increased slightly. Further, Spain spend the highest amount of money on research in renewable energy sector among the four different countries shown in the chart.
Looking the data set that was escalated consistently in more details it is lucid that the money spent on research in Spain was about USD 0 in 1975. By 2000, it grew dramatically and reach USD6 per person, that was the highest value in the chart. Additionally, Denmark also follow the same trend, was starting from the same point of Switzerland, USD 0, and reaching 3.5 in 2000.
Turning the remain data set that was came down it is evident that USD 0 was spended in Switzerland on research in 1975. By 1980, it climbed up to $1, then again decrease to $0.5 in 1985. By 2000, it fell to $0.1. It was the lowest increase that was spent on research in the chart. UK also followed the similar trend, starting from $0 in 1975, it increased $1.1 in 1980 and dropped 0.6 in 2000.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-14 | Zahid6400 | 67 | view |
| 2021-08-24 | dhruv j patel | view | |
| 2021-08-24 | dhruv j patel | 55 | view |
| 2021-01-06 | Cowy | 78 | view |
- True success can be measured primarily in terms of the goals one sets for oneself 50
- To be an effective leader a public official must maintain the highest ethical and moral standards 50
- The line graph shows the population size birth rate an death rate of England and Wales from 1700 to 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant 73
- When old buildings stand on ground that modern planners feel could be better used for modern purposes modern development should be given precedence over the preservation of historic buildings 50
- The best ideas arise from a passionate interest in commonplace things 54
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 193, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[7]
Message: The proper name in singular (Spain) must be used with a third-person verb: 'spends'.
Suggestion: spends
..., it increased slightly. Further, Spain spend the highest amount of money on research...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 38, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'come'.
Suggestion: come
... Turning the remain data set that was came down it is evident that USD 0 was spend...
^^^^
Line 4, column 146, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...earch in 1975. By 1980, it climbed up to , then again decrease to sh.5 in 1985. By...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, so, then, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 17.0 5.60731707317 303% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1078.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 236.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.56779661017 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47103248281 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.483050847458 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 298.8 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 1.53170731707 522% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.4086076169 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.8 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.3 5.23603664747 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146793232016 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0690019030699 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0492952817253 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100839675012 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.036293382951 0.0819641961636 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.