The graph shows the percentage of male and female academic staff members across the faculties of a major university in 2012.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart shows the proportion of men and women who taught in seven different faculties of a particular university in 2012.
There was a large gender disparity in some faculties: engineering was dominated
by male academics whereas education had the highest percentage of female
academics. Notably, 85% of the engineering teachers were male and only 15%
female. Three quarters of the academic staff in education were women, with just
25% males.
However, other faculties were more balanced in their composition. In medicine,
gender representation was almost equal, while in arts subjects slightly more than
half the academics were female (55%). It is interesting to note that business and
science had the same proportions of men and women, with 65% male to 35%
female academics in those faculties. Law had a slightly higher percentage of
women at 40%.
Although the faculties of engineering, business, science and law were still
primarily male- dominated in 2012, women made up half the faculty of
medicine and were predominant in education and arts.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-10-28 | thatfrostbyte | 73 | view |
| 2020-04-13 | Maryielts | 67 | view |
| 2020-03-14 | Hector Padilla | 78 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 72, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ion of men and women who taught in seven different faculties of a particular univ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, still, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 919.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43786982249 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86970657974 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603550295858 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 285.3 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.8387208219 43.030603864 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.111111111 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7777777778 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.22222222222 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 13.0 3.83414634146 339% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171067159729 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0713383242534 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0304547729502 0.0843802449381 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0650908724976 0.15604864568 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.054928983221 0.0819641961636 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 61.2550243902 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 11.4140731707 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.