Is human relationships with pets useful?
Relationship between humans and pets began a long time ago. Thus, it is easy to see that pets have a vital role in our life. While some people can say that if you have a pet, you will have to spend a lot of money, and sometimes they bring you some problems if you do not take care of them well. I prefer to think that having pets brings more advantages than disadvantages, and I definitely believe that the relationship between pets and humans is relevant for both.
First of all, if we think in someone who lives alone, we could find out some interesting benefits. For example, my grandmother lives alone in her house, and she has a little dog who stays with her. This dog has allowed my grandmother does not feel alone and feeling more safety. Thereby, it is a great benefit for her and the dog as well, because the dog has someone who takes care of him. Therefore, it is a by-directional benefit.
Second, It is important to point out that pets can help in different things, like staying with people who cannot see and they can be their guide. Thus, it is a relevant issue that demonstrates the powerful link which exists between them and us. For instance, a person who needs help to cross the street, a dog would be a great help for this situation.
It does not matter how to look like the human being and what kind of pet it is, the relationship is belonging to these issues. Pets can share with you at different times of your life and can carry out many roles depending on what kind of requirement you need. Even though It seems a lack of feeling by humans, it always is a relationship in which together are lacking something, and they need it to fill.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-25 | Hector Padilla | 60 | view |
- torreya plant 73
- Is human relationships with pets useful 60
- Should parents make decisions for their teenage children? 60
- Sometimes it is better not to tell the truth 56
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category or exports in 2016 compared with 2015 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 98, Rule ID: NON_ACTION_CONTINUOUS[3]
Message: The verb belong is usually not used with a continuous form, use the simple form instead. Suggestion: 'belongs'
Suggestion: belongs
...hat kind of pet it is, the relationship is belonging to these issues. Pets can share with yo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 98, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...hat kind of pet it is, the relationship is belonging to these issues. Pets can share with yo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 314, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[5]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually put after the verb 'is'.
Suggestion: is always
...t seems a lack of feeling by humans, it always is a relationship in which together are la...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, second, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, kind of, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 52.1666666667 71% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1358.0 1977.66487455 69% => OK
No of words: 310.0 407.700716846 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.38064516129 4.8611393121 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4663900999 2.67179642975 92% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 212.727598566 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535483870968 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 421.2 618.680645161 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.3145190688 48.9658058833 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.5333333333 100.406767564 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.13333333333 5.45110844103 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23726531693 0.236089414692 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0830602834112 0.076458572812 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100383540481 0.0737576698707 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138694704308 0.150856017488 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0958214974333 0.0645574589148 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 11.7677419355 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 58.1214874552 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.12 10.9000537634 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.77 8.01818996416 84% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 86.8835125448 48% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.