The graph shows the percentage of male and female academic staff members across the faculties of a major university in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
The bar chart depicts the percentage of male and female staff members across different faculties in a major university in the year 2012.
On analyzing the graph, there are two main faculties which interested the male and female staff members largely with male staff members being dominant in the Engineering and female being dominant in Education faculty.The male staff members shares the same percentage in science and business while female being only half the percentage as male.Next to the Education, the other faculty which had the female percentage more is the arts field where male staff members were quite less compared to all other faculties in the unviersity.
Though there were quite differences in the percentage in the faculty there was one faculty where both male and female staff members were in equal proportion.It was medicine.It nearly accounted to 50 % of the staff members in the year 2012.
The other faculty is the Law and the science field where there was nearly same percentage as male and female proportions in the university.It could be inferred from the graph that the academic percentage of the year 2012 shows that engineering and education has more number of students in the university than other faculties.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-08-21 | yamini venkatesan | 67 | view |
- The diagram shows how electricity is generated by a hydroelectric dam.Write a 150-word report for a university lecturer explaining how the process works. 67
- In many developed countries life expectancy is rising while birthrates are falling As a result the elderly will make up a much larger proportion of the population in future Is this a positive or negative development 81
- The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparsions where revelant. 67
- The graph shows the percentage of male and female academic staff members across the faculties of a major university in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 217, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...ale being dominant in Education faculty.The male staff members shares the same perc...
^^^
Line 2, column 343, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Next
... being only half the percentage as male.Next to the Education, the other faculty whi...
^^^^
Line 3, column 157, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: It
... staff members were in equal proportion.It was medicine.It nearly accounted to 50 ...
^^
Line 3, column 173, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: It
...ere in equal proportion.It was medicine.It nearly accounted to 50 % of the staff m...
^^
Line 4, column 139, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: It
...nd female proportions in the university.It could be inferred from the graph that t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1037.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13366336634 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65480224441 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.445544554455 0.547539520022 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 332.1 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 8.94146341463 45% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 50.0 22.4926829268 222% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 144.842155466 43.030603864 337% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 259.25 112.824112599 230% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 50.5 22.9334400587 220% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 2.25 5.23603664747 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.382391046578 0.215688989381 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.260748577103 0.103423049105 252% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0577844804508 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.260748577103 0.15604864568 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0577844804508 0.0819641961636 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 28.0 13.2329268293 212% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 20.73 61.2550243902 34% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 22.8 10.3012195122 221% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 13.36 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 28.5 11.4329268293 249% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 22.0 10.9970731707 200% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.