The graph shows the percentage of people who use mobile phones in four situations, grouped into four age groups
The bar chart describes the proportion of four typical phone situations by using cell phones with four different group ages. Overall, people used to call when they are in public transport and street and the number of people who around 18 to 29 is using the phone more often than other ages.
People from 18 to 29 have the highest rate of using the cell phone in public transport at 90% then followed by 30 to 49 with 80% and 50 to 64 with 70%. The percentage of the people are 65 or above who call in public transport is at lower 60%. Moreover, people who use the cell phone in the street have over 80%, while others are nearly it. In addition, half of the percentage of people age from 18 to 29 call cell phones at the restaurant. This figure is followed by age of 30 to 49 and 50 to 64 and 65 above respectively at 40%, 30%, and 18%. Furthermore, only the rate of the people around 18 to 29 call on family dinner which accounted for nearly 20%, whereas others are approximately at 10%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-02 | buiminhduc | 67 | view |
| 2021-09-01 | buiminhduc | 89 | view |
- Topic Many young people now know more about international pop and movie stars than famous people in the history of their countries What are the causes Give solutions to increase the number of people to know about famous people in history 78
- The chart below shows the number of girls per 100 boys enrolled in different levels of school education Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The charts below show the result of a survey of adult education The first chart shows the reason why adults decide to study The pie chart shows how people think the costs of adult education should be shared 74
- Task 1 The bar chart below shows the passenger kilometers traveled by different means of transport in the UK in 1990 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Doing an enjoyable activity with a child can develop better skills and more creativity than reading To what extent do you agree Use reasons and specific examples to explain your answer 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, moreover, then, whereas, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 800.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.2328042328 4.92477711251 86% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33295537377 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.481481481481 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 237.6 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.6673882938 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.0 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.625 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 5.23603664747 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271391833789 0.215688989381 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132037065483 0.103423049105 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0990782413897 0.0843802449381 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.249781382649 0.15604864568 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10393066016 0.0819641961636 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.55 11.4140731707 66% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.7 8.06136585366 83% => OK
difficult_words: 23.0 40.7170731707 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.