The graph shows the percentage of UK adolescents following a vegetarian diet. Summerise the information by selecting and reporting the main features.
The line graph illustrates the proportion of British teenagers who were vegans over a 60-year period from 1960 to 2020.
It is clear that during the time given, the number of adolescents leading a vegan lifestyle significantly increased, and the year 1980 was when there were most young vegans in the UK.
Starting at 0 percent in 1960, over the next 20 years, the UK teenage vegans rate rocketed to its highest point, at over 15 percent, in 1980. However, in the next 10 years, the percentage of UK adolescents being vegans sharply declined by approximately 10 percent. Then, from 1990 to 2000, the figure witnessed a variation.
In 2000, there was about 5 percent of young people in the UK chose a vegetarian lifestyle. After that, over the following 10 years, the percentage of young UK vegans moderately climbed to roughly 10 percent in 2010. Consecutively, it slightly inclined before experiencing a leveling off at around 12 percent during the last 10 years. This was much higher than the initial figure yet slightly smaller when compared to its highest point.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-14 | vivianisme | 78 | view |
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to Scotland who visited four different attractions in Edinburg Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The graph shows the percentage of UK adolescents following a vegetarian diet Summerise the information by selecting and reporting the main features 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 897.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95580110497 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75453013796 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602209944751 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 257.4 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.4474884417 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.6666666667 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1111111111 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.88888888889 5.23603664747 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.106966538132 0.215688989381 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.04830292869 0.103423049105 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0438123884387 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0638106528763 0.15604864568 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0185849798183 0.0819641961636 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.