The graph shows the percentage of university students in 18-25 years old in four countries between 1961 and 2011.
The line graph gives information about the proportions of university students who were between 18 and 25 years old in Singapore, the Philippines, Thailand and Malaysia during the period from 1961 to 2001.
Overall, there were general upward trends in the rates of students in all the countries. It is also noticeable that Singapore and Thailand experienced a dramatic rise throughout the given years.
Starting at around 15% in the first year, the percentage of Singaporean students at university was nearly three times as high as that of Thailand (5%). After that, the figures for these two countries climbed continually to 60% in 2011.
In comparison, 30% of students in this age group accounted for 30% of the total in the Philippines compared to only 3% in Malaysia. Afterward, the Philippines saw a slight increase in its figure, to approximately 42% in the following decade before witnessing downward fluctuations to end at less than 40%. Simultaneously, the proportion of students from Malaysia rose gradually to more than 20% and levelled off in the last two periods.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-10-23 | denistran85 | 84 | view |
- The table gives information about five types of vehicles registered in Australia in 2010 2012 and 2014 78
- The graph shows the sales of six essential products on Webuy in the first half of 2020 84
- The chart below shows the percentage of total US population aged 65 and over between 1900 and 2000 78
- The picture below shows how a hot balloon works 73
- The graph shows the sales of six essential products on Webuy in the first half of 2020 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 437, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d levelled off in the last two periods.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 903.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13068181818 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02801464257 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.659090909091 0.547539520022 120% => OK
syllable_count: 266.4 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.0814454057 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.875 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.875 5.23603664747 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255711824417 0.215688989381 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0852367964834 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10345141624 0.0843802449381 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144405128269 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.123431260348 0.0819641961636 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.