The table below gives information about the values of exports of kiwi fruit from New Zealand to five countries between 2010 and 2012.
The table illustrates changes in the total amount of money that New Zealand earned from exporting kiwi fruit to Japan, China, Mexico, Russia and Saudi Arabia during the period from 2010 and 2012.
Overall, there were general upward trends in the earnings of kiwi in Japan and China, while the figures for the other countries experienced a reverse trend. It is also clear that Japan was considered the leading exporting market over the given period.
271,100,000 NZ dollars was the value of kiwi exports to Japan compared to that of China (74,900,000 dollars). After that, the export values in these two countries increased remarkably to 325,300,000 dollars for the former and 94,000,000 dollars for the latter. In comparison, Russia was ranked third on the list, rising noticeably from around one million dollars to over 2,400,000 dollars within two years.
Regarding Mexico, New Zealand gained 6 million dollars when selling kiwi to this country in 2010, followed by a threefold drop in its value two years later. Over the same period, the export of this type of fruit to Saudi Arabia went up markedly to more than 400,000 dollars at the beginning before witness a sudden fall to only 82,000 dollars in the following two years.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-12 | duongbinhnam | view | |
| 2023-08-12 | duongbinhnam | view | |
| 2023-07-17 | tieuquynh | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-22 | Roy An | 89 | view |
| 2023-06-22 | Roy An | 78 | view |
- The chart below shows the percentage of male and female teachers in six different types of educational setting in the UK in 2010 84
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste 67
- The charts show the info about the use of Internet in five countries in Europe in 2000 73
- Every year an increasing number of people suffer from fast food related diseases The government therefore should impose a high tax on fast food To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Today TV channels provide men s sport shows more than women s sport shows Why Should TV channels give equal time for women s sport and men s sport 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, regarding, so, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1029.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01951219512 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37653610426 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60487804878 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 293.4 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.1550804063 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.625 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.625 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.125 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218575571821 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105566485697 0.103423049105 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0939970597474 0.0843802449381 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155035879684 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0984029672171 0.0819641961636 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.