The graph shows the population of three countries in 1950 and 2000 (in millions) and their projected population figures for 2050. The table shows the life expectancy figures for the years 1950 and 2000 and the projected figures for 2050 for the same three countries.
The data provides information about the population and life expectancy figures between 1950 and 2000 (in millions) in three different countries and the estimates for 2050.
As can be seen from the graph, China and the USA presented an increase in the growth of population which is expected to continue. China's population grew significantly from 700 to 1200 millions over a fifty year period and is forecast to reach 1500 millions in 2050, while Spain's figures show a different picture, which slightly increased 10 millions in the period from 1950 to 2000 and is projected to marginally declined to 35 millions in 2050. The USA's population rose from 200 millions in 1950 to 300 millions in 2000 and is expected to gain 400 millions in 2050.
Life expectancy in all three countries show a rise in years 1950 to 2000. During this period, the USA had the largest life span (73 and 75), while China had the smallest one (65 and 68). Life span in China and Spain is expected to grow more five years in 2050, while the figure for the USA is projected to drop to 74 in 2050.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-02-26 | nhu11104884 | 88 | view |
- The chart below shows the changes in car ownership in Great Britain between 1961 and 2001 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisions where relevant 71
- The graph shows the population of three countries in 1950 and 2000 in millions and their projected population figures for 2050 The table shows the life expectancy figures for the years 1950 and 2000 and the projected figures for 2050 for the same three co 88
- Children brought up in families with less money are better prepared for life than those from wealthy families To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 386, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ions in the period from 1950 to 2000 and is projected to marginally declined to 3...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 878.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.59685863874 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49960387202 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.486910994764 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 245.7 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 72.7949314226 43.030603864 169% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.428571429 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2857142857 22.9334400587 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.28571428571 5.23603664747 25% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.48716331109 0.215688989381 226% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.243909572343 0.103423049105 236% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.149581730078 0.0843802449381 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.368285500393 0.15604864568 236% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.087770790098 0.0819641961636 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.45 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.7 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 11.4329268293 171% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.