The graph shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between
1940 and 2040 in three different countries.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make
comparisons where relevant.
The line graph compares the percentage of older people having ages 65 and above living in USA, Sweden and Japan from 1940 to 2020. Overall, it can be seen that, despite some fluctuations, the total number of such individuals in all three countries had increased over time.
There was a dramatic increase in the number of elderly in Japan. At the beginning of time frame, it had the least number of elders, accounting to only 5%. However, after 2020, the country witnessed a drastic surge in the aged population, to finish at 25% in 2040, which was the highest of that year.
In contrast, USA and Sweden saw a more moderate rise over the period. The USA’s adult population stood at around 9% in 1940, higher than the other two countries, it gradually increased until 1980 after which it became stable for the next few years. Following that, the percentage started to rise a little just to secure the lowest level amongst the other two countries. Sweden followed a fairly similar pattern for the majority of period, except that after 1990 it’s population exceeded that of the USA’s, and it kept going up to land just under that of Japan having a total 25% adult individuals by 2040.
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make compa 73
- The graph shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between1940 and 2040 in three different countries.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and makecomparisons where relevant. 11
- The chart below gives some of the most reported issues among people living in UK cities in 2008 (%).Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words 78
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.The line graph shows thefts per thousand vehicles in four countries between 1990 and 1999.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.Write at le 78
- the line graph below shows the consumption of four kinds of meat in a European Country from 1979 to 2004 53
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, so, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 996.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78846153846 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49034749007 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620192307692 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 300.6 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.9382362831 43.030603864 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.666666667 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1111111111 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.66666666667 5.23603664747 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.102743526991 0.215688989381 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0392667227499 0.103423049105 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0258528711731 0.0843802449381 31% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0684144381389 0.15604864568 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0264877005528 0.0819641961636 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.