The chart below gives some of the most reported issues among people living in UK cities in 2008 (%).
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words
The bar graph illustrates the different problems faced by the residents of some main cities in UK during the year 2008.
Overall, it can be said that health services was a serious issue in most of the cities, followed by education and training. However, air pollution remained a minor problem.
On one hand, in the cities of Newcastle, Belfast, Birmingham, Cardiff, Manchester and London more than 50% of population reported to have faced the health related problems. The highest proportion being in Belfast and Cardiff, accounting for just a little below 60%. Moreover, issues of education and training stood slightly above 50% for the cities of Belfast, Birmingham, Cardiff, Glasgow and London.
On the other hand, there were only few cases pertaining to the environment, accounting for less than 10% for most of the cities in question, including Newcastle, Belfast, Birmingham and Glasgow. Nevertheless, in Cardiff, Manchester and London it was reported to be at around 12 to 15%, which is slightly greater than the other areas.
- The chart below gives some of the most reported issues among people living in UK cities in 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 70
- the bar chart below shows the percentage of people who ate five portions of fruit and vegetables per day in the U.K from 2001 to 2008. 78
- the bar chart below shows the percentage of people who ate five portions of fruit and vegetables per day in the U.K from 2001 to 2008. 78
- The chart below gives some of the most reported issues among people living in UK cities in 2008 (%).Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words 78
- the line graph below shows the consumption of four kinds of meat in a European Country from 1979 to 2004 53
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 874.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23353293413 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80571991737 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.604790419162 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 249.3 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.1928237382 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.25 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.875 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.25 5.23603664747 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130992970405 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0566072629431 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0387768955516 0.0843802449381 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0835083043128 0.15604864568 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.036145130705 0.0819641961636 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.