The graph shows weekly expenditure on fast food in Britain by food and income group.
The bar chart compares the amount of money spent on three different types of fast food by three income groups in the UK in 1990.
It is clear from the bar chart that there were significant differences in the type of fast food eaten by each group. Additionally, the expenditure on fast food by low income was by far lowest during the research period.
The amount of money spent on hamburgers was highest in the high income, at 42 pence. Meanwhile, consumers spent on 17 pence and 19 pence on Fish&Chips and on Pizza, respectively. In the average income, the expenses on hamburgers were also higher than on the other fast food, at approximately 33 pence, whereas the amount of money spent on Fish and Chips was 25 pence. The lowest expenditure was only 12 pence on Pizza.
In the low income, the expenses on Fish&Chips was higher than on Hamburger and Pizza, at 17 pence. Meanwhile, roughly 14 pence on Hamburger compared to only 7 pence on Pizza.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-02-23 | Jasmine0812 | 56 | view |
- The map below is of the town of Garlsdon. A new supermarket (S) is planned for the town. The map shows two possible sites for the supermarket. 61
- The flowchart below shows the process involved in completing the work experience requirement for university students. 73
- The chart below shows a comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in 1995 and 2005. 61
- The graph below shows the number of books read by men and women at Burnaby Public Library from 2011 to 2014. 61
- The maps below show the changes that have taken place at the seaside resort of Templeton between 1990 and 2005. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 782.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.62721893491 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63024240973 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 81.0 106.607317073 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.479289940828 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 237.6 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.6569010564 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.8888888889 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7777777778 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.11111111111 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192530190622 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0939080137583 0.103423049105 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102589787241 0.0843802449381 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154378977761 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.128294441382 0.0819641961636 157% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.2329268293 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.96 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.