The map below is of the town of Canterbury. A new school (S) is planned for the area. The map shows two possible sites for the school.
The map shows two potential locations for a new school in the town of Canterbury.
We can see that the main difference between the proposed sites is that the first site (S1) is in the countryside, while the second site (S2) is in the heart of the town center. Additionally, S1 is the only location which lies on the main road.
According to the map, S1 is outside in the town to the northeast of Canterbury, but this site is within easy reach of the housing zone. Meanwhile, S2 is also surrounded by the residential area, which is located in the town center. Neither site can take advantage of the University site, which is close to the town and borders in the countryside.
There are two main roads from Chartham and Sturry to Canterbury town center. However, there is a central no traffic zone, this would be unable to reach S2 by car. Additionally, the town of Sturry is only 5 kilometers from S1 along the main road. S2 is an ideal location for the population coming from Chartham, and this would make it accessible by the main road.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-16 | gunel muradova | 89 | view |
| 2019-12-01 | taanduy | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-22 | Hoang Luan | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-04 | minhthanh211 | 73 | view |
| 2017-07-07 | Thao Anh194 | 67 | view |
- The graphs below provide information on global population figures and figures for urban populations in different world regions. 73
- The map below is of the town of Garlsdon. A new supermarket (S) is planned for the town. The map shows two possible sites for the supermarket. 61
- The graph below shows the number of books read by men and women at Burnaby Public Library from 2011 to 2014. 61
- The map below is of the town of Garlsdon. A new supermarket (S) is planned for the town. The map shows two possible sites for the supermarket. 73
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 852.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.50793650794 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63961249047 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.507936507937 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 259.2 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.8137956117 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.2 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8 5.23603664747 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266610294168 0.215688989381 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122589230476 0.103423049105 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.170499894845 0.0843802449381 202% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.237237943532 0.15604864568 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.2225495381 0.0819641961636 272% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.88 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.