The graphs below depict information about the Expenditure on Health and Education in the UAE (% of GDP) between 1985 and 1993, and also Infant Mortality and Life Expectancy from 1970 to 1992.
So clearly do the charts point out that the percentage of health and education outcome based on GDP data over eight years commenced from 1985 in UAE, and also the rate of baby death (per thousand births) and the expectation of lifespan counted per years between 1970 and 1992 can be reported.
It can be seen that when the outlay of health and education funds experienced an increase during the period, infant mortality numbers decreased significantly. As a result, an inclining trend was belonged to life expectancy proportions.
Looking at the first chart, funds spent on education sector rose commonly, standing at 10% at the beginning of period. In the next five years, this number was 4% higher than the starting level. In 1993, the proportion went up slightly to 14%. Meanwhile, health sector had a similar trend with education programs but it saw a slight drop (to around 7%) in 1990 that its initial year. In the three following years, budget granted to education division grew to the same proportion as acquired by the other sector in 1985.
Moving to the last chart, the rate of human-life expectation in 1970 was 60 years. In the next 22 years, it climbed by 10 years. Meanwhile, starting at 70 in 1970, the mortality baby numbers fell dramatically to roughly 60 in 1992.
- The diagram shows the skeletal systems of two ancestors of modern human beings 86
- The chart below shows the percentage change in the share of international students among university graduates in different canadian provinces between 2001 and 2006 85
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries. 84
- The diagram below shows the process by which bricks are manufactured for the building industry. 78
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, so, while, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1067.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 221.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82805429864 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63863376722 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 106.607317073 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615384615385 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 298.8 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.516132642 43.030603864 152% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.0 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0909090909 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.54545454545 5.23603664747 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246488005331 0.215688989381 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0757339086808 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0631588759883 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142100843148 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.057303316401 0.0819641961636 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.