The first bar chart illustrates the proportion of the population who own computers from 2002 to 2010 and the second one gives data about the proportion of computer ownership by the level of education, reported between 2002 and 2010.
Overall, the percentage of people who possess computers increased over the period. According to 5 levels of education, the more educated people, the higher proportion of computer ownership.
It can be seen in the first chart that the percentage of computer owners in the given period was extremely high, which was never under 58%. In 2002, nearly 60% of the total population have their own computers. The proportion continued rising steadily until it reached about 77% in the next 8 years.
In the second chart, it is clear that the percentage of people who are at a higher level of education was always greater than the inferior ones. Besides, the figure for the people who have no high school diploma experienced the sharpest change, surged from about 15% to over 40% from 2002 to 2010. At the same time, the figure for people have postgraduate qualifications was the highest, rising from about 75% to nearly 100%. The figure for high school graduates, college students, and people who have bachelor's degrees were around 40%, 55%, and 70% in 2002 and all climbed to nearly 70%, 85%, and 95% respectively in 2012.
- The diagram below show the life cycle of a species of large fish called the salmon Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The plans below show a student room for two people and a student room for one person in an Australian university 61
- The chart and table below give information about population figures in Japan Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The diagram illustrates how steel rods are manufactured in the furniture industry Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Some say that the most important thing about being rich is that one has the opportunity to help other To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, if, second
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1129.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 229.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93013100437 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58191258043 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545851528384 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 327.6 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.885989813 43.030603864 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.9 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.6 5.23603664747 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293358017801 0.215688989381 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112777714091 0.103423049105 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0961654518309 0.0843802449381 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197411090932 0.15604864568 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107072023283 0.0819641961636 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.