The chart illustrates the foreign and native students are being enrolled in Australian universities over a ten-year period.
It is clear that the number of enrolment of local students outnumbered the foreigner. Nevertheless, there has been a gradual increase, which leads to the rise of the total number of overseas students.
In the line graph, it can be seen the commercing number of foreign students enroll in Austalia students was over 100.000 in 2001 and the total is applied is approximately 200.000 figures. And these figures witnessed an upward trend at the peak of 400.000 in 2009 and remained steadily at 2010. On the other hand, the total number of foreign students rose from 200.000 in 2001 to 800.000 in 2010, a 4-fold increase.
The total of native students climbed from 400.000 to 600.000 in the first six years before remained steadily in 2010. Moreover, the number of commercing native students increase stable from 180.000 to 220.000 in 2002 before slightly decreasing at 190.000 in 2006. This number then climbed slightly before landing at 200.000 in 2010.
- Some people believe that hosting international sports events is good for the country while some people think it is bad Discuss both these views and state your opinion 56
- At the present time the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults compared with the number of older people Do you think that the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 73
- Some people think that people moving to a new country should accept new culture in the foreign country rather than living as a separate minority group with different lifestyle Do you agree or disagree 84
- Some people say that the main environmental problem of our time is the loss of particular species of plants and animals Others say that there are more important environmental problems Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
- The chart andgraph below give information about participants who have enteredthe Olympics since it began Summarise the information by selecting and reporting on the main features and make comparisons where relevant 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 277, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...reasing at 190.000 in 2006. This number then climbed slightly before landing at 200....
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, moreover, nevertheless, then, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 908.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12994350282 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64288447131 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.542372881356 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 243.0 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.1343629772 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.888888889 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243810287525 0.215688989381 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129857950384 0.103423049105 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.1427578563 0.0843802449381 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210331226064 0.15604864568 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.151751864906 0.0819641961636 185% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.