The graphs below show the enrolments of overseas students and local students in Australian universities over a ten year period.
The line graph illustrates application from foreign and local students to Australian universities in ten-year period.
Overall, number of enrolments of local students was much higher than the overseas students. However, commencing rates for both types of students was lower than total number of enrolments.
In the graph, it can be seen that in 2001, 20000 foreign students applied to Australian universities. In contrast, commencing rates was slightly lower than the total number of applications at around 17000. At the end of the period, even though both sections experienced dramatic increases gap between number of total and commencing enrolments is expanded significantly. (80000 total, 40000 commencing)
When it comes to the local students, commencing rates were always lower than the total number of enrolments and remained stable at around 200000 enrolments with some fluctuations. However, total number of applications were at 400000 in 2001 but it increased rapidly until levelled off at 600000 enrolments in 2007 then it remained the same over the period.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 280, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'increases'' or 'increase's'?
Suggestion: increases'; increase's
...ough both sections experienced dramatic increases gap between number of total and commenc...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, then, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 917.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.59146341463 4.92477711251 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92898167806 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55487804878 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 257.4 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.3873507075 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.625 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.875 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274492804412 0.215688989381 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147684540466 0.103423049105 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.138882781089 0.0843802449381 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218248163072 0.15604864568 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.14643457225 0.0819641961636 179% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 11.4140731707 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.