The graphs below show information about weekly hours in Australia in 2001. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie charts illustrate trends in working hours duration amid different Australian levels of workforce during 2001.
Looking from the overall perspective, the majority of workforce spends long hours at works (above forty-one hour per week) and equals to 40%. This quantity surpasses the number of workers, those have part-time employment, by 7% and full-time workers by 13% respectively.
Also, as can be seen from the graph, more than one million managers and owners spend over 41 hour during the week, so in percentage proportion it is hovering around 67%. The remaining employment of managers are almost evenly distributed between two types of work full-time and part-time with percentage values of 19% and 14% accordingly. Ordinary employees appears not to follow the same pattern: approximately a third of employees work from 35 to 40 hours per week. Other 33% of workers have long hour occupation and a remained part of stuff spends under 35 hours with their work obligations.
In general words, job occupation was dramatically unevenly distributed among Australian workforce with a strong predominance of long-hour employment among owners and managers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-25 | lethianhthu | 78 | view |
| 2022-07-23 | abeanick | 53 | view |
| 2022-01-31 | mad | view | |
| 2021-11-19 | xuanmai2501 | 73 | view |
| 2021-11-19 | xuanmai2501 | 11 | view |
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in 2000 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The two maps below show the road access to a city hospital in 2007 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Laws should not be rigid or fixed Instead they should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances times and place of the offence To what extent do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer 84
- The graphs below show the annual spending of a particular UK university from 1981 to 2001 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The charts below show the percentage of men and women in different weight groups in England between 1993 and 2002 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 45, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'hours'' or 'hour's'?
Suggestion: hours'; hour's
...pie charts illustrate trends in working hours duration amid different Australian leve...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 108, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'hour' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'hours'.
Suggestion: hours
...nds long hours at works above forty-one hour per week and equals to 40%. This quanti...
^^^^
Line 3, column 94, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'hour' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'hours'.
Suggestion: hours
...llion managers and owners spend over 41 hour during the week, so in percentage propo...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, if, look, so, third, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 983.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4010989011 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92186312897 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.67032967033 0.547539520022 122% => OK
syllable_count: 288.0 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 21.5170717106 43.030603864 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 122.875 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.875 5.23603664747 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0909912949264 0.215688989381 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.04321118277 0.103423049105 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0292226026714 0.0843802449381 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0552794242679 0.15604864568 35% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0194666921753 0.0819641961636 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 11.4140731707 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.