The table below shows the production and consumption of natural gas in different countries in 2001. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant.
This table shows the information on natural gas consumed and produced by nine different territories in the first year of the 21st century. It can be observed that the USA, the Former Soviet Union, Japan and South Korea utilized the resources more than they exploited them, while the opposite was true in the case of the other five countries.
Most noticeably of all, it is evident that the USA was the largest in both resource consumption and production, the former at almost 589 million tonnes and the latter at 500 million, to the extent where the numbers were five or seven times larger than those for the United Kingdom, which was in second place in the same category. In contrast, there was little or no record in the number of gas production of the Former Soviet Union, South Korea and Japan although their usages were moderate with around 7, 20 and 69 million tonnes respectively.
On the other hand, China and New Zealand were 2 of the nations where the gap between gas usage and exploitation was less than 1 million tonnes, whereas the gap for Australia and the UAE varied between around 6 and 9 million tonnes.
- The graph below shows the flu rate among males and females of a large country in June 1996 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The table below shows the production and consumption of natural gas in different countries in 2001 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant 53
- The graph below shows the flu rate among males and females of a large country in June 1996 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so, whereas, while, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 925.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67171717172 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4026022776 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616161616162 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 283.5 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 39.0 22.4926829268 173% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.7200129618 43.030603864 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 185.0 112.824112599 164% => OK
Words per sentence: 39.6 22.9334400587 173% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.8 5.23603664747 264% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.101977200119 0.215688989381 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0664764786521 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0745445228321 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0705281340743 0.15604864568 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0359758376159 0.0819641961636 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.4 13.2329268293 154% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.1 10.3012195122 156% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.4 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.06136585366 120% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 17.6 10.9970731707 160% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.