The graphs below show the number of hours Canadians spend on watching TV from 1990 -2000. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The graphs compare how are time-consuming on watching broadcasts that people are living in Canada during the 10 years, from 1990 to 2000.
Overall, it can be seen that the entire population in Canada tend to plummet within spending time in front of the television, while the elderly-people are preferred to viewing television rather than the rest of the ages between 1990 to 2000.
With the first bar chart, in 1991, an average Canadian television viewing is over 23 hours per week, otherwise, it witnessed a constant decrease to 22.7 hours in 1994. While there was a significant growth up to nearly 23 hours per week in 1995, afterwards, it was slightly going down to 22.7 hours in 1997. In comparison to the later years, the number of residents is watching television which had been dropped to a low of 22.2 hours per week in 2001.
In the second chart, in preference to the level of age, kids in the range of 2 to 11 are experienced in watching television about 19 hours per week. However, the middle age in terms of 12 to 49 years old, they are not in favour of watching television, it has just below 20 hours per week with at 16 hours, 15 hours, 15.5 hours, and 19 hours, respectively. Nevertheless, there was a considerable going up to roughly 25 hours for those between 50 and 59 ages and continuing to over 30 hours every week for those over 30 ages.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-17 | TranMinhDuc | 78 | view |
- Multicultural societies where people of different ethnic groups live together can bring more benefits than drawbacks to a society To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- The process below shows how drinking water is made using solar power Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information given below 79
- Nowadays celebrities are more famous for their glamour and wealth than for their achievements and this is a bad example to adolescents To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Today in many countries people are living in a throwaway society where things are used for a short time and then thrown away What do you think is the cause and what problems will it lead 84
- Good schools and medical facilities are available only in cities Some people think new teachers and doctors should work in rural areas for a few years but others think everyone should be free to choose where they work Discuss both and give your own opinio 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 452, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o a low of 22.2 hours per week in 2001. In the second chart, in preference to th...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 33.7804878049 157% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1118.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 246.0 196.424390244 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.54471544715 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68499550698 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556910569106 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 316.8 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 34.6590536512 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.75 112.824112599 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.75 22.9334400587 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.375 5.23603664747 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160537995584 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0756079206852 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0376008942016 0.0843802449381 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101554240259 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0353546003411 0.0819641961636 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.41 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.64 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.