The graphs below show the percentage of men and women aged 60 64 who were employed in four countries in 1970 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The graphs below show the percentage of men and women aged 60-64 who were employed in four countries in 1970 and 2000. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features make comparisons where relevant.

The graphs compare the percentage between men and women who were employed at the age 60-64 in 1970 and 2000 in 4 different countries.
Overall, The proportion of old employees in 4 countries decreased and women were less than men.
First of all, the USA was the nation that had the highest percentage of old people still did their work at 86% in men and 78% in women in 1970 before declining to 78 % and 45% respectively in 2000. Secondly, the figure for people who 60-64 worked in Indonesia made up 84% men and 65% female, while this number fell by 10% at men and 15% at women in the next 30 years. Thirdly, male workers at the age 60-64 were higher than female workers who had the same age by 10% in 1970, then Japan witnessed a huge chance, which the percentage in two genders decreased to 63% and 47% respectively. Lastly, similarly like 3 countries, there was a downward in the percentage of workers in Belgium, who age 60-64 from 79% to 52% in men and turned down significantly from 63% to 8% in 2000.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, lastly, second, secondly, similarly, still, then, third, thirdly, while, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 822.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.39572192513 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51466950076 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572192513369 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 231.3 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 41.4031668139 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.0 112.824112599 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.1666666667 22.9334400587 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 16.0 5.23603664747 306% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.31961306643 0.215688989381 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.180468089852 0.103423049105 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10343471129 0.0843802449381 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.25881855675 0.15604864568 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111865459848 0.0819641961636 136% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 73.85 61.2550243902 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.83 11.4140731707 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.