The graphs below show the size of ozone hole over Antarctica an the production of three ozone-damaging gases from 1980 to 2000. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
size:12.0000pt;">There are two given line graphs which both shows information between 1980 and 2000. While the first chart illustrates the size of the ozone hole of antarctica, the other describes the amount of three different types of gases that destroy the ozone layer.size:12.0000pt;">
size:12.0000pt;">Generally, the ozone hole’s size increased dramatically during the period of 20 years, and CFC-12 and Nsize:12.0000pt;vertical-align:sub;">2size:12.0000pt;">O can be seen as the two major factor causing that happened.size:12.0000pt;">
size:12.0000pt;">In particular, the size of the ozone hole over antarctica was under 500 million square kms in 1980. The figure then reached a peak at nearly 2000 thousands square kms in 1990 prior to the slight drop to about 1100 thousands square kms between 1992 and 1993. After that period, the ozone hole’s size became bigger with a significant number, which is as double as the previous size, at around 3500 thousands square kms in 2000.size:12.0000pt;">
size:12.0000pt;">The factors that leads to this negative increasing are the three gases, symboling at A, B, C for CFC-11, CFC-12 and Nsize:12.0000pt;vertical-align:sub;">2size:12.0000pt;">O respectively. The amount of A emission to the environment was recorded at almost 70 million tonnes in 1980. Despite being stable in the next three years, that amount of A suddenly declined substantially to just over 10 million tonnes in 1995, and continued to decline to around 5 million tonnes in the next five years. At the same time, the statics of B expericenced a rise from almost 30 million tonnes in 1980 to nearly 50 million tonnes in 2000. In the contrary, it was not until 1990 that the amount of C was recored to be emitted to the eco system. The firgure rose quickly by 30 million tonnes throughout 10 years.size:12.0000pt;">
- Some people think the increasing business and cultural contact between countries brings many positive effects. Others say it causes the loss of national identities.Discuss both sides and give your opinion. 84
- The unlimited use of cars may cause many problems What are those problems In order to reduce the problems should we discourage people to use cars 78
- In many countries, the costs of living are rising. What are the effects on individuals and society? Suggest solutions to this problem. 61
- Nowadays, the traditions and customs relating to the food we eat and the way we eat are changing. Why is it happening? Do you think this kind of change is positive or negative? 56
- It is said that the amount of violence on the TV programs has negative effect on our social development and therefore should be reduced.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Size
size:12.0000pt;'>There are two given li...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, then, while, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 33.7804878049 154% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1662.0 965.302439024 172% => OK
No of words: 282.0 196.424390244 144% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.89361702128 4.92477711251 120% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 7.47424530236 2.65546596893 281% => Word_Length_SD is high.
Unique words: 154.0 106.607317073 144% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54609929078 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 432.0 283.868780488 152% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 173.472380126 43.030603864 403% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 184.666666667 112.824112599 164% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.3333333333 22.9334400587 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11111111111 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151651772299 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0645368992448 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.05814278445 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133171878467 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0874844620326 0.0819641961636 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.0 13.2329268293 166% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.47 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.47 11.4140731707 153% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 21.0 11.4329268293 184% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 22.0 11.0658536585 199% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.