The line graph shows the size of the global population from 1400 to 2000, and the pie charts show the global population by region in 1900 and 2000. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The three graphs illustrate the worldwide population. Particularly, the two pie charts demonstrate the global population by continents in two specific years (1990 and 2000) while the line graph describes the growth of the world population from 1400 to 2000.
In general, during the six centuries period, the world population grew dramatically especially in asia and Europe.
The world population was estimated at under 500 million in 1400 before increasing slightly each centuries, and reached a peak at over 1.2 billion in 1700. Despite having a small decrease in 1800, the number rocketed to 6 billions in the next two centuries.
As can be seen from the pie charts, asia accounted for the largest shares (more than a half) in both years, followed by Europe. However, the two figure experienced a significant drop by 6% and 10% respectively. There was no change in the percentage of world population from North america, but the figure of Latin america, Africa and others increased largely by 5%, 8.5%, 2.5% respectively.
- The unlimited use of cars may cause many problems. What are those problems? In order to reduce the problems should we discourage pEople to use cars. 84
- It is important for children to learn the difference between right and wrong at an early age Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion What sort of punishment should parents and t 84
- International travel is becoming cheaper, and countries are opening their doors to more and more tourists. Do the advantages of increased tourism outweigh its disadvatages? 61
- Computers are increasingly used in education. In which areas do you think are computers more important and in which areas are teachers more important? 73
- The unlimited use of cars may cause many problems What are those problems In order to reduce the problems should we discourage people to use cars 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 861.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15568862275 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89002657024 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.652694610778 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 253.8 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.2979481187 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.625 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.875 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.375 5.23603664747 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207714844522 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0745708169485 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103257689107 0.0843802449381 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121069943342 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117063247231 0.0819641961636 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.