The graphs compares the consuming habits of people in UK in 1971 and 2001.
It is clear that overall spending on essentials decreased considerably from 1971 to 2001. While nearly half of people’s income were spent on food in 1971, a clear majority of money was paid for cars in 2001.
Looking at the information in more detail, we can see that 44% of the English people’s money were used to buy food in 1971. Expenses on this part only made up 14% of the total spending in 2001. By contrast, English people spent on restaurants twice as much as before in 2001. The cost of furniture fell slightly by 1% during these years.
With regard to non-essentials, spending on cars accounted for only 22% of the total expenditure of people in England, accompanied by cost for petrol occupying 10% in 1971. The figure for cars almost doubled to 43% and the percentage of petrol decreased to 8% in 2001. As for cultural expenditure, English people spent merely 6% and 2% of their income on books and computers in 1971. Spending on computers increased tenfold to12% while the percentage of books fell respectively to 1% in 2001.
- the graphs show changes in the spending habits of people in the UK between 1971 and 2001 Write a report to a university lecturer describing the data 73
- The flow chart illustrates the consequences of deforestation Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The diagram shows the components of a neuron and how it works Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You sh 78
- The maps below show the changes of a school from 1985 to present time Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevan 11
- The importance of biodiversity is being more widely recognised as increasing numbers of species come under threat What can be done to maintain biodiversity 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 12, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'compare'.
Suggestion: compare
The graphs compares the consuming habits of people in UK in...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
look, while, as for, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 932.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73096446701 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69945783191 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532994923858 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 261.9 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.0737385781 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.7272727273 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9090909091 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.18181818182 5.23603664747 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237978299853 0.215688989381 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104996176571 0.103423049105 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0919915793796 0.0843802449381 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194218277407 0.15604864568 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105123387846 0.0819641961636 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.2329268293 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 61.2550243902 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.86 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.