The graph below show the value of clothing exported from Bangladesh between 1998 and 2012, and the pie chart shows the destinations and value of exported clothing in 2012.
The line chart shows the changes of the value of clothing exported from Bangladesh at intervals of 4 years from 1998 to 2012. The pie chart gives information about where the clothing was exported to and its value there in 2012.
It is substantial that value of clothing exported from Bangladesh increased respectively in the 24-year period. Among the destinations, European Union occupied most of the value.
Export earning from clothes in Bangladesh was nearly 2 billion dollars in 1998. It rose steadily in the following 16 years and tripled to 6 billion dollars in 2004. Since 2004, it grew almost twice as fast as before and reached 20 billion dollars in 2012.
Looking at destinations, European Union imported clothes of 11.38 billion dollars from Bangladesh in 2012, occupying 60% of the total exportation. This is more than the rest of them combined. The statistic for USA is 4.53 billion dollars, or 24%, the second most. The least one is Turkey which imported only 0.36 billion dollars, only 1% of the exportation.
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries 67
- The most important function of music is that helps people reduce stress or relaxing To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- The maps below show the changes of a school from 1985 to present time Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevan 11
- The importance of biodiversity is being more widely recognised as increasing numbers of species come under threat What can be done to maintain biodiversity 61
- As languages such as English Spanish and Mandarin become more widely spoken there is a fear that many minority languages may die out Some countries have taken steps to protect minority languages What is your view of this practice 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
look, second
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 861.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00581395349 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68533540371 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56976744186 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 236.7 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.1454606345 43.030603864 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.2727272727 112.824112599 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6363636364 22.9334400587 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.09090909091 5.23603664747 21% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.399404152201 0.215688989381 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154510283261 0.103423049105 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.182658451915 0.0843802449381 216% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.267668339621 0.15604864568 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.207928782092 0.0819641961636 254% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.48 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.32 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.