The graph below shows the average monthly change in the prices of three metals during 2014 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The line chart gives information about how the prices of copper,nickel and zinc varied with months in 2014.

It is clear that copper and nickel prices went down overall,while zinc prices went up slightly. Nickel had the most significant price fluctuations between months.

In January 2004, nickel prices increased by 6% compared to the previous month, which is higher than the copper (2%) and zinc (1%). However, nickel prices dropped to 1% by March and reached a low of -3% by June. The changes for copper and zinc were less dramatic, with zinc seeing a 3% increase in February before a downward trend for the first half of the year. Copper prices also fell, mostly staying around 1% to-1%.

In the second half of the year, nickel prices continued to decline, except for a 1% increase at the end of the year. Copper prices remained stable around 1% from July onwards, with a small increase in December. Zinc prices had a slight drop of 0.5% for most of the latter part of the year, followed by a surge of 2% in December, which was the highest point reached among all the minerals’ prices.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 64, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , nickel
...formation about how the prices of copper,nickel and zinc varied with months in 2014. ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 60, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , while
...pper and nickel prices went down overall,while zinc prices went up slightly. Nickel ha...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, second, so, while, except for

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 906.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69430051813 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41475237259 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559585492228 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 250.2 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.5426424217 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.6 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.23603664747 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0982783478538 0.215688989381 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0492280594128 0.103423049105 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0310102231811 0.0843802449381 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0782035210397 0.15604864568 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.033763651181 0.0819641961636 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.28 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.