The graphs show enrolment in different colleges in the Higher Colleges of Technology in 1999.
The presented charts outline the registration of males and females in the Higher Colleges of Technology in 1999. The spectacular feature of the chart is a paramount involvement of females in every college.
As is observed from the first graph, females outnumbered the males in almost each college to be precisely by 87 in Al Ain, 20 in Abu Dhabi and 126 in Dubai. However, there was a difference of 76 and 21 in Ras Al Khaimah and Sharjah College respectively.
Furthermore, women graduates exceeded by 135 in certification while this proportion was twice in case of a higher diploma. It is interesting to note that there were no males with bachelor's. In addition, exactly half of the pupils were in certificate level while a bit more than a quarter were diploma holders. Moreover, a tiny fraction held Bachelor.
All in all, a supreme proportion of individuals had enrolled in Dubai College in turn in the diploma and majority of generation was of females.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-07 | toshaklg | 93 | view |
| 2019-12-04 | hunanmail | 73 | view |
| 2018-08-01 | Drragkloha | 95 | view |
| 2018-07-25 | eyraen | 67 | view |
| 2017-01-31 | Stephanie Kaushal | 93 | view |
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade*-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries. 73
- The table below shows the cinema viewing figures for films by country, in millions. 11
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to in 2000 and 2010. 93
- The chart below shows the average daily minimum and maximum levels of two air pollutants in four big cities in 2000. 78
- Most people are not interested in how their food has been produced They only care about how much it costs How true is this statement What influences people when they buy food 39
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 803.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89634146341 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00190178665 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621951219512 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 265.5 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.2780929213 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.2222222222 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2222222222 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.77777777778 5.23603664747 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251266185704 0.215688989381 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0868152582069 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104305861634 0.0843802449381 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136681991966 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0722229318135 0.0819641961636 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.