he bar chart below shows the estimated percentage of car trips taken by drivers in 2005
Write a report.
The bar chart illustrates the users of car trips from men and women for a various purposes in 2005. The purposes are measured in percent.
Overall, the percentage of users of car trips from men was higher than of women. Both the men and the women used cars mostly in work purpose, while that men least using car was for bank and running errands, compare to women was for visiting town.
In term of work purpose, men used car trips above 50% as opposed to almost 40% for women. The users for visiting town from men was higher than those users from women ( almost 10% and less than 10%). Expandly variance usage from men for cars in recreation purpose over 10% compare to women almost used it for that purpose.
In contrast, women used cars for shopping almost 20% compare to men exactly 10%. The users from women exceeded 10% for courses purpose as opposed to men not reach 10%( Less than 10% ). Bank and running errands women were higher users ( almost 10% and exactly 10% ) although men was almost a users for this purpose.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-01-11 | Esraa Emam | 67 | view |
- The graph shows the number of boys and girls playing sport in an English town in 2012 61
- he bar chart below shows the estimated percentage of car trips taken by drivers in 2005Write a report. 67
- The chart below shows the number of men and women in further education inBritain in three periods and whether they were studying full-time or part-time.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where rele 56
- The dangers and complexities of the modern world have made the mobile phone an absolutenecessity for children.To what extent do you agree or disagree?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge andexperience. Wri 38
- The chart below shows the number of men and women in further education inBritain in three periods and whether they were studying full-time or part-time.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where rele 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 166, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n was higher than those users from women almost 10% and less than 10%. Expandly v...
^^
Line 7, column 181, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...posed to men not reach 10% Less than 10% . Bank and running errands women were hig...
^^
Line 7, column 232, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... running errands women were higher users almost 10% and exactly 10% although men...
^^
Line 7, column 260, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...higher users almost 10% and exactly 10% although men was almost a users for this...
^^
Line 7, column 286, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a user' or simply 'users'?
Suggestion: a user; users
...nd exactly 10% although men was almost a users for this purpose.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
while, as for, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 839.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.53513513514 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 1.99725936631 2.65546596893 75% => OK
Unique words: 77.0 106.607317073 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.416216216216 0.547539520022 76% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 246.6 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.1906818816 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.9 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.6 5.23603664747 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0760081585563 0.215688989381 35% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0534255777379 0.103423049105 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0617128326443 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0771482757663 0.15604864568 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0529230956557 0.0819641961636 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.05 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.83 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.