A HISTORY OF TWO TOWNS
The maps collate how Meadowside village and Fonton, which is a neighboring town, have evolved over three different time periods (1962, 1985 and the present). Overall, Meadowside village enlarges in size and has become Meadowside Suburb as it integrated together with Fonton. Furthermore, infrastructure, housing, and facilities have significantly altered over the period given.
In 1962, there was a completely dispensed with no roads or rail subjoining between Meadowside and Fonton. Interestingly, Fonton had a railway line running through it to the north whilst Meadowside only had a small road from the west which situated to the west of Fonton.
Subsequently, by 1985, there was a considerable enlargement in the size of Meadowside village and Fonton. As a result, the small road in Meadowside village had been transformed into the main road and was also extended to the east to associate with Fonton. Meadowside, moreover, had also inaugurated a housing estate in the west, a leisure complex and a supermarket in the south.
Currently, both Meadowside, which is now a suburb, and Fonton are amalgamated. Particularly, the railway line, which runs through Fonton, has been elongated to the west where a train station has been built. To the north of the station, a hotel has been constructed compared with to the south, there is now a business park.
- Oil use of major consumers in millions barrels per day 73
- Discussion the reason why people define happiness differently and how to obtain happiness. 61
- The pie charts below describe average household expenditures by major categories in Japan and Malaysia in 2010 78
- Leisure time in a typical week in hour by sex and employment status, 1998-99 96
- Discussion the reason why people define happiness differently and how to obtain happiness 57
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, moreover, so, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1139.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 218.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2247706422 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.051010504 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532110091743 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 351.0 283.868780488 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.5033308581 43.030603864 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 103.545454545 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8181818182 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.36363636364 5.23603664747 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0162445931349 0.215688989381 8% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00675766041707 0.103423049105 7% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0213695985719 0.0843802449381 25% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0106350608552 0.15604864568 7% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0184204657429 0.0819641961636 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.