The given chart illustrates the overall number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories: local-landline, national and international-landline and mobiles, over a period of 10 years, starting from 1995.
Overall, from 1995 to 2001, the UK witnessed an upward trend of the number of minutes using telphone calls, while in the remaining three years the figure is on the downward trend with the growth throughout the years of national and international-landline.
During the first seven years, almost data depended on local-landline with 12000 minutes (millions) in 1995 and then continued to climb steadily to 17000 minutes in 2001, and national and international-landline. Meanwhile, opposite change can be seen in the amount of mobiles which took only a small part or almost none in the first year.
After that, the figure started decline and the distance between categorises is gradually shortened. Typically in 2004, the propotion of time using telephone calls in UK was only approximately 1000 minutes apart.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The given chart illustrates the overall ...
^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eriod of 10 years, starting from 1995. Overall, from 1995 to 2001, the UK witne...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f national and international-landline. During the first seven years, almost dat...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...part or almost none in the first year. After that, the figure started decline a...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 106, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Typically,
...een categorises is gradually shortened. Typically in 2004, the propotion of time using te...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 890.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39393939394 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.55332459852 2.65546596893 134% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.606060606061 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 265.5 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.5577165522 43.030603864 148% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.333333333 112.824112599 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5 22.9334400587 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.215688989381 0% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.103423049105 0% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.15604864568 0% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.2329268293 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 61.2550243902 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 11.4140731707 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.