The table elucidates the figure of labour force and silk mills in the England and Wales from 1851 to 1901.
Overall the number of workers had witnessed a sharply downward trend over the period, however, the quantity of factories was negatively correlated in the tendency.
As a deep analysis of the chart disclosure, it is explicitly observed that in the year 1851, it was lump of labour, after having a tremendous sull to 109.869 the next decade, the number of employees experienced a enormous decline to 91412 in the year 1871 and 67904 in the year 1881, before plummeting to 49025 and 38942 among the year 1891 and 1901.
Giving a shufty on this period, it is lucid that from 1851 to 1861, the number of mills appreciable accelebration to 761 before seeing a slight lull to 693 in the year 1871, after it saw a modest drop to 663 and 623 on the last decade, the figure of factories underwent a minimal climb to 702 in the year 1881
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 67
- The table shows the number of employees and factories producing silk in England and Wales between 1851 and 1901 Link table https drive google com file d 1bN1Kakm812OcI3ntl5QQlne RNQC5d M view 73
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 67
- Schools should teach children some academic subjects which will be beneficial to their future careers Therefore other subjects such as music and sports are not important To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 78
- The bar chart below shows the number of men and women studying engineering at Australian universities 93
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 212, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...de, the number of employees experienced a enormous decline to 91412 in the year 1...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 768.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.51764705882 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51401607326 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.558823529412 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 218.7 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 8.94146341463 45% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 42.0 22.4926829268 187% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 100.610635621 43.030603864 234% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 192.0 112.824112599 170% => OK
Words per sentence: 42.5 22.9334400587 185% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.75 5.23603664747 33% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152688466538 0.215688989381 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108631577123 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0912600427599 0.0843802449381 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108631577123 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0912600427599 0.0819641961636 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.1 13.2329268293 159% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.23 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.1 10.3012195122 156% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.82 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 18.8 10.9970731707 171% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.0658536585 172% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.