The given tables deliniate the sales data of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in five countries in the years 1999 and 2004.
According to the first graph, the UK had the highest sales amount of coffee which increased from 1.5 to 20 million euros in the given years. In addition to that, Switzerland doubled coffee sales from 3 to 6 million euros. While Denmark showed a slight rise from 1 to 1.7 million euros, Belgium and Sweden had the lowest amount of increasing from 1.8-2 and 0.8-1 million euros, respectively.
Moving back to the second graph, it is seen that Sweden and Denmark demonstrated downward trend. However, a threefold increase can be observed in Switzerland bananas sales starting with 15 million euros. Additionally, the UK and Belgium showed the same pattern and their sales grew from 1 to 5.5 and 0.6 to 4, respectively.
Generally speaking, it is obvious that except for the UK sales amount, both coffee and bananas had almost the same range which varies from 0.6 to 1.8.
- The table shows the percentage of very good rated by first year students 88
- The graph below shows the percentage of urban suburban and rural households in a European country that had Internet access between 1999 and 2004 74
- IELTS Task 1 Tables give information about sales of fairtrade labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries 73
- The maps show the village park 10 years ago and the village park now 79
- In the past, shopping was a routine domestic task. Many people nowadays regard it as a hobby. To what extent do you think this is a positive trend? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, second, while, except for, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 831.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88823529412 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72172472288 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552941176471 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 233.1 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.2714938168 43.030603864 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.875 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 5.23603664747 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200105787373 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109174641308 0.103423049105 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.15391117855 0.0843802449381 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182197701403 0.15604864568 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.187304462844 0.0819641961636 229% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.